Contest - Importance of Incorporating Standardized Tests and Measures

hand-pen-noteOur practice standards expect evidence-based approaches to the care we deliver. More and more, health plans including Medicare, Medicare Advantage and various commercial insurances are requesting outcomes to measure the value of the services we provide. Just recently, the IMPACT Act was signed into law, which will require standardized reporting of outcome measures for patients receiving therapy services in Post-Acute Care Settings.

Standardized outcome measures provide a common language with which to evaluate the success of therapy interventions. This provides a basis for comparing outcomes related to different intervention approaches. Measuring outcomes of care within the relevant components of function, including body functions and structures, activity and participation among patients with the same diagnosis is the foundation for determining which interventions comprise the best clinical practice.

As professionals we need to capture evidence-based documentation. Incorporating standardized tests is an easy way to show evidence-based data to support our intervention.

There are a number of tests that are available for free and many are referenced in the POSTette located on the Therapy Portal entitled, “Therapy Tests and Measures.” Some tests do require purchase and can be expensive – we recommend focusing on the diagnoses you treat most and purchase accordingly.

Standardized measures also help to:

  • Identify dysfunction and deficits
  • Remove subjective factors from assessment
  • Provide results that can be generalized and repeated, which provides for external validity and reliability
  • Compare deficits to normative data by age group
  • Provide a “starting” point especially with the increased emphasis on evidence based practice
  • Provide measurable/objective outcomes for patient success from start of care to discharge to improve quality of care
  • Provide evidence based information to support intervention and reimbursement
  • Allow for tracking and trending of outcomes over time.

To Enter the Contest: Complete a blog entry below on how you successfully implemented the use of standardize testing into your clinical programming and documentation. A committee will review all entries to determine winners. The names of winners will be posted and prizes will be sent to you at your facility. HAVE FUN!!

The Deadline: Friday December 19th

With Perseverance, Patients and Therapists Find Success at Veranda

TherapyAt Veranda Rehabilitation and Healthcare in Harlingen, Texas, there is no greater incentive for our therapists to persevere through difficult cases than to see patients returning home to carry on with their lives. In the example of one client, admitted to Veranda with a gunshot wound to the mouth and presenting with ETOH abuse, B nephrolithiasis, malnutrition, liver cirrhosis and other symptoms, it was clear from the start that this patient would require extensive therapy. However, our therapists were up for the task, and his story is just one of many that demonstrates how our commitment to a positive outcome allows us to create a partnership for healing with even the most challenging patients.

This client, we’ll call him Joe, entered Veranda not only with multiple physical ailments, but emotional distress as well. Angry, depressed and unwilling to participate in therapy upon admission, Joe seemed determined to do anything but listen to his therapists. One can understand his frustration: After living independently in a mobile home community, now Joe required total assist for all mobility and ADLs and was eating a modified diet of mechanical soft food and honey-thick liquids.

With persistence and continual education on the benefits of therapy, we began to create a rapport with Joe. Once we turned that corner, Joe became an active participant in his treatment program and began to see progress, albeit slow. The road was long and winding leading up to Joe’s discharge, to say the least. During his stay, Joe was transferred to hospital three times due to multiple medical issues. While there, he went into both respiratory and cardiac arrest and was put on a ventilator.

Joe’s therapists remained dedicated to his treatment despite the bumps in the road. Physical therapy included functional exercise tolerance, BLE strengthening and coordination, standing balance facilitation and gait training. Our occupational therapists worked on NMR, BUE strength, sitting balance, UE coordination, self-care training and e-stim for pain management. Lastly, SLP treatment included oral motor retraining and dysphagia treatment.

After four months of hard work, Joe was discharged home and now lives alone and independently with all ADLs. He ambulates without an assistive device, eats a regular diet with thin liquids, manages his own finances and drives his own car. While we are thrilled with the outcome of Joe’s treatment, we are even happier that he has reclaimed his life and makes the time to visit us frequently at Veranda. Joe never fails to express his gratitude that our therapists did not become discouraged despite the initial challenges. To this, we would say, it is our great pleasure to serve clients like Joe and help them emerge from treatment with a new lease on life.

Story of Recovery Sets Benchmark for Future Treatments

Park Manor-useWhen 42-year-old Heather entered Park Manor Rehabilitation Center in Walla Walla, WA, she had already experienced more struggles than many people twice her age. With a medical history of diabetes mellitus and lower-back pain, Heather had visited the emergency room due to pain in her right lower extremity — at the time, thought to be sciatic pain. An MRI was negative for a herniated disc; however, an X-ray confirmed she had necrotizing fasciitis.

Heather’s diagnosis led to her transfer to Kadlec Medical Center, where the wound was debrided and a wound vac put in place. After receiving antibiotic treatment, she was life-lighted to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle for further care, which included debridement of the right thigh, calf and gluteal area, perineum and groin through four separate incisions. Admitted to the ICU, intubated and placed in a coma for four weeks, Heather underwent a total of 12 debridement surgeries.

During this time, Heather also developed VRE. Her family was told she had less than a 15 percent chance of survival. Despite the odds, Heather persevered and stayed at Harborview for a total of seven weeks. From there, her journey began with Park Manor Rehab for post-acute care.

With some prior experience as a CNA, Heather was high-functioning at admission and had been living with her daughter in an apartment on the ground floor. She was (I) with all ADLs, including bathing. Additionally, she was (I) with all IADLs, including driving. As for her functioning levels at evaluation, she required 100 percent mod assistance for grooming from her bed as well as maximum assistance with toileting, upper body dressing, bed mobility and transfers. She was dependent for lower body dressing and bathing and unable to ambulate.

The team at Park Manor enlisted the collaborative efforts of physical and occupational therapy to get Heather on the road to wellness. A combination of electrical stimulation and short wave diathermy in physical therapy worked to increase circulation in order to promote wound healing. Meanwhile, occupational therapy worked on increasing Heather’s upper extremity strength and coordination, activity tolerance and improving her ability to participate in functional tasks.

Upon discharge 96 days later, Heather had achieved modified independence with ambulation, grooming, toileting and upper-body dressing. She required standby assistance with lower-body dressing, minimal assistance with bathing, and modified independent or standby assistance with transfers. Perhaps most astounding was the remarkable healing of her wounds. In fact, when she went to a final appointment to schedule a skin graft for her right lower extremity prior to discharge, her doctor decided instead to suture the last remaining opening, and no skin graft was required.

Heather was discharged home to her apartment with home health services initially. Later, she returned to Park Manor for outpatient therapy. Although Heather’s necrotizing fasciitis case was complex, it served as a benchmark by which to design future treatments. Park Manor has since received two more cases of necrotizing fasciitis and also has seen an increase in patients with extensive wounds and wound vacs, which we have treated successfully with the high-volt e-stim. As for Heather, we are happy to see her continuing to make great strides in her recovery!

Improving Quality of Life for Terminal Patients

Quality of LifeFor patients with a terminal illness such as cancer, hospice is not the only answer — and certainly not the best one in many cases. That’s something Northeast Rehabilitation Center in San Antonio, TX, learned firsthand in working with Patient P., a woman who presented with stage III lung cancer and whose chemotherapy treatment had proved ineffective. When told by her doctors that she needed to consider hospice, P. refused — and those of us at Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center stepped in to provide rehabilitation services.

P. entered our facility with multiple confounding factors, including aspiration pneumonia, neuropathy, COPD, poor trunk control, Hx of hip fx with resultant leg discrepancy, a peg tube and oxygen dependency. Moreover, she weighed just 80 pounds and was both emotionally and financially devastated by her diagnosis. To make matters worse, her husband needed to work and was therefore unavailable to assist her during the day. P. simply was overwhelmed and wanted to be at home.

Doing our best to create a home away from home for P., the team at Northeast Rehab took an interdisciplinary approach that included occupational, physical and speech therapy. For occupational therapy, we emphasized BUE strengthening exercises, sitting balance, progression from Hoyer to sliding board transfers, wheelchair mobility, coordination and feeding. Physical therapy focused on bed mobility, BLE strengthening, balance, trunk control, transfer training, sitting and standing tolerance, and wheelchair mobility. Lastly, speech therapy included laryngeal elevation exercises to increase airway protection, positioning during and after PO intake, nutrition, and swallow strategies and training. Needless to say, we all had a busy schedule, especially P.!

The three teams collaborated frequently to continue encouraging P. along her journey, reinforcing a positive approach and reminding her daily of her progress in each discipline. Although P. would become discouraged at times, we would invite her to reframe her thinking and notice how far she had come since admission. Gradually, P. began to realize that each incremental gain was another step toward reaching her larger goal of going home.

Indeed, it truly was a team effort that enabled P.’s positive outcome and ability to return home after being in our facility for 55 days. At the time of discharge, she required Min A for standing pivot transfers, SBA for bed mobility, and SBA/CGA for dressing and toileting. She was (I) with self-feeding and grooming/hygiene, her endurance had increased from less than one minute to greater than 30, and she was able to propel her own wheelchair. With her family trained on transfers and a home exercise program, P. went home on a regular diet and thin liquids with no further need for a peg tube.

P.’s success in the cancer rehabilitation program not only improved her quality of life and allowed her to go home with her family, but also allowed for greater visibility and credibility of the program with insurance companies and with the medical community. We negotiated with P.’s insurance provider for maximum visits and also received more patient referrals to our facility as a result of working with P.

In addition, our own rehab team increased their understanding of rehab for terminally ill clients. As evidenced with Patient P., working with these residents is often one of the most rewarding and inspirational experiences we could ever have.

Barihab Table Case Study

Barihab tableSometimes, one new piece of equipment makes all the difference for a patient. Take, for instance, the case of one resident at Mountain View Rehabilitation and Care Center (MVR) who was admitted following a right middle cerebral artery aneurism, with coil embolization of aneurism, aneurism perforation and resultant subarachnoid hemorrhage. Hospitalized for three and a half months prior to admission at MVR, Patient R. entered our facility with multiple challenges preventing her from living a more independent life. However, with our therapists’ patient and caring approach, plus the addition of a Barihab table to her treatment routine, R. has made incredible strides in her recovery.

At admission, R. had a host of challenges to overcome, among them:

  • Severe right-side neglect causing her to persist in twisting her trunk to the left and grabbing the bed sheets and bed rails on her left side
  • Inability to maintain an upright position for more than five minutes
  • Total dependent standing pivot transfer with a left prosthetic limb, requiring two therapists due to R.’s severe retropulsion and falling to the left
  • Peg tube for feeding with NPO
  • Two therapists required for bed mobility, including rolling and transferring from supine to sitting at the edge of the bed
  • Total dependency for all dressing, hygiene and grooming

Before joining us at MVR, R. had received some rehab services at the hospital, but she had failed to make any progress. Her situation changed once our therapists began to work with her and encourage progress throughout her ups and downs.

Initially, R. required transfer with a Hoyer lift and had difficulty remaining seated in her wheelchair because she was sliding or squirming out of it. Therapists continued to work with her on standing pivot transfers, balancing from sitting, and sitting balance on the treatment mat in the therapy gym. Eventually, R. progressed to standing by positioned parallel bars close to the high-low table.

The game-changer came about when MVR acquired a Barihab table and began to incorporate it into R.’s therapy regimen. Because the table provides greater security, R. felt less fear of falling, and over time, she gained greater confidence in her own mobility. She now stands using the Barihab table and self-supports with her UEs while ambulating through the parallel bars, then transitions to a FWW and walks 35 to 40 feet while wearing her left prosthetic limb.

Says Sam Wipf, OTR/L (DOR), “We have just opened a new world of possibilities with the Barihab table, no question about it.”

R.’s family and therapists agree that the table has enabled a remarkable recovery for the resident. Among her many accomplishments, she is now self-feeding on a mechanical soft diet, no longer requires a bed pan and needs one person for toileting, ambulates with a FWW across the rehab gym and into the hallway, and is completing the majority of her transfers with a standing pivot approach with one person.

The Barihab table has proved to be an invaluable addition to MVR’s therapy program — one that continues to benefit patients like R. and others. “I can now stand residents who I never thought I would ever be able to stand,” says one therapist.

Adds one family member of another patient: “He actually stood for 10 minutes. He hasn’t stood for months.”

Another therapist perhaps sums up our sentiments about the Barihab table most succinctly: “Why didn’t we know about this before?” Now that we know, we expect to continue using the Barihab table for many of our patients who are mobility-challenged.

Providing a Treatment Plan for Pannus Support

p-pannus-2-300x300For patients with excessive pannus, whereby the skin on the lower abdomen hangs down due to rapid weight loss, there are multiple complications that can arise. The condition increases the risk for excessive external hip rotation contracture, skin breakdown due to trapped moisture and decreased lower-extremity strength and range of motion.

Patients with no medical complications might choose to have the excess skin surgically removed. However, for some patients, such as Patient G.D. at Wellington Place Living & Rehab, surgery is not an option and we must find alternative treatments.

G.D. is an older woman who had lost a significant amount of weight, resulting in a pannus that would sit in between her legs. She was scheduled to have surgery to have the pannus removed, but due to some co-morbidities, she was unable to proceed with the surgical procedure. The patient’s health declined, and she was no longer able to transfer herself. That’s when she joined us at Wellington.

We initially used a sheet to address G.D.’s pannus complications, which included rashes and candidiasis, but the sheet was quite cumbersome, and the patient was unable to self-release from it quickly. The sheet also made G.D. overly warm, thus increasing the moisture to her perennial area and the top of her thighs.

Next, we tried a wheelchair security belt with a padded area meant for the stomach. We secured the belt to her bed rails with cable ties, which we then used as positioning devices for bed mobility. The quick-release button made it easy for G.D. to release from the belt, and the padded belt was smaller, cooler and more comfortable for her.

By consulting with our PM&R physician, DOR, Physical Therapy and Nursing, we created a treatment plan for G.D. that addressed her various needs. As a result of our collaborative efforts, G.D. is now able to complete a HEP to maintain strength and range of motion in both lower extremities. She also has increased leg adduction, is able to keep neutral hip positioning while at rest in her bed, and is no longer experiencing rashes or discomfort due to excess moisture. Most importantly, G.D. is happier and healthier now that we’ve found a solution that works for her particular needs.

Finding Relief with the Kinesio Tape Protocol

When Patient B. came to us at San Marcos Rehabilitation & Health Care with persistent shoulder pain, he was experiencing reduced activity tolerance and participation, a decreased upper-extremity range of motion and a need for assistance with ADLs. His shoulder pain measured 8 out of 10 on his B shoulders; his muscle strength was at 3+ out of 5 for his shoulder flexors, abductors and extensors; and his Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score was 90 out of 100. Needless to say, B. had a lot of work ahead of him, as did our therapists.

Through the collaborative efforts of Physical Therapy and Nursing, we designed a treatment program for B. that would allow us to help the patient progress while also monitoring his pain levels. Using the SPADI score allowed for an objective measure of pain relief as we set to work with various therapies, including a kinesio taping technique, therapeutic exercises to strengthen the shoulders, and scapular mobilization and gentle Grade 3 joint oscillation (inferior glide) of the humerus for two minutes at a time. For the first intervention, we incorporated kinesio taping of the B shoulders based on protocol developed by Kase, Wallis & Kase (2003). The second intervention included preheating the shoulders with a hot pack for 15 minutes, followed by various shoulder and scapular mobilization techniques.

The outcome for B. has been positive, as he now reports an improvement in pain relief, registering at 3 to 5 out of 10 — compared to his initial complaint of 8 out of 10. By week four, His SPADI score had dropped to 80, compared with 90 initially, and although this score did not meet the minimal clinical importance difference criteria where a 13-point difference is required, the patient did have a subjective improvement in pain relief.

Perhaps the most significant takeaway for B. has been the kinesio-taping technique, which has improved his ability to sleep at night and to interact with his environment. All numbers aside, it’s always a pleasure to see patients experiencing a reduction in pain and an improved quality of life as a result of our combined therapy efforts.

Developing a Post-Acute Cardiac Wellness Program

heart_pictureAs we are all well aware, CMS has begun penalizing hospitals for unplanned readmission of certain diagnoses, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) and pneumonia (PN). This new rule brought into focus specialty areas where the post-acute care settings could partner with the hospitals for improved outcomes. Many skilled nursing and rehabilitation programs have always accepted patients with cardiac conditions, but they are now talking about their role in relation to reducing hospital readmissions. In many cases, the SNF, HH and outpatient programs are providing therapy to these patients under the general rehabilitation program.

We have seen the opportunity in some of our markets to further develop well-defined cardiac specialty programs with quality outcome measures in place (such as the CARE Item Set and NOMS), for the primary purpose of enhancing the transition of care for this highly specialized population. By implementing this type of specialty program, we believe that hospital readmissions, greater patient satisfaction and higher success with transitions of care will be achieved. When we add in the fact that we will be able to provide measurable outcomes using standardized tools such as CARE and NOMS, measuring the overall effectiveness of the program and evaluating opportunities for further development will be more distinguishable.

In 2012, your therapy resource team developed a tool that could be used to help facilitate the steps for developing a specialty program. In 2014, we refined it using the specialty of cardiac wellness as an example, sharing it through leadership meetings and the Therapy Portal. Three of our facilities took the information from the meeting and identified cardiac specialty physicians who were eager for a program that could help transition their patients from the acute hospital stage and back into the community. The facilities reached out for therapy resource support with development, and as we dug in with these three programs, we began to see the opportunity to create something special that could be shared across the organization. We then turned this support into a collaborative program development pilot, where we are asking them to be a part of creating a packaged program that can be implemented by our facilities throughout the organization. The pilot facilities are Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center in Tucson, Brookside Healthcare Center in Riverside, and Victoria Care Center in Ventura.

Together with service center resource support, the three facilities have each identified the facility IDT interested in the program and developing the skills necessary to enhance expertise, identified a need in their communities by talking with health partners, invested in some of the equipment deemed essential for getting started with a post-acute cardiac wellness specialty program, helped to refine components of the guidelines being created, and are contributing to the development of clinical pathways relevant to our cardiac diagnoses and setting. One of the consistent questions that the teams were struggling with as they embarked on this specialty program development was where to start once they had secured internal interest and a potential need within their healthcare communities. Therapy Resource support was helpful with how to have those initial conversations for the facility to springboard into the next steps.

At Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation and Care Center, administrator Eli Robbins, DNS Quinny Mazzola, DOR Valerie Berg and a therapy resource met together with Dr. Tirrito, a local cardiologist, to discuss the need in the community for a transitional program such as this one. Dr. Tirrito was instantly intrigued, as he identified a significant need for the patients within his own practice. Dr. Tirrito is well-established in the Tucson community, working with Pima Heart and a variety of hospitals and health plans. He has helped us consider different definitions to the program. He provides rounds on a regular basis, he provides ongoing in-service education to the facility staff, and he assists with creating in-roads to various health partners for Sabino to spread their message. They are taking his patients and using the experience to continue to help with the development of the program. During the development phase, the Sabino Canyon Therapy Team was in need of more specific expertise. We are working with Ellen Strunk, who not only holds an Expert on Exercise with the Aging Adult and Geriatric Specialty Certification, but also has extensive experience with developing cardiac rehab and wellness models. Ellen has helped us to create and deliver a training and competency program for our own therapists.

At Brookside Healthcare Center, Matt Stevensen, in partnership with Vangie Bravo, Ron Layos and a therapy resource, began conversations with the Dignity Health Partners and local Hospital Liaisons about a need for this type of program. Dr. Slayyeh, a local Cardiovascular Surgeon, is a great partner and has helped to further define our admission criteria. He and the Dignity Health Partners are also helping to create a transition from the acute hospitalization to our setting, as well as transitions beyond the Skilled Nursing and Rehab stay.

At Victoria Care Center, the team has created a very strong physician advisory board with a variety of physician expertise. John Gardner, Juvie Lopez and Sacchin Bhatia, along with therapy resource support, began seeking areas of potential need for more post-acute care expertise within the community. Dr. Patel, a cardiologist and one of the board members, agreed with our suggestion of the need for a transitional post-acute cardiac wellness program. He brought the idea back to a group of surgeons and partners in the practice. As we were moving through the development phase of the program, he suggested involving an expert from the Cardiac Rehab Program at Henry Ford Hospital, Dr. Steve Keteyian. We have partnered with Dr. Keteyian to add his expertise in further development of the clinical aspects of the program. In addition to directing Henry Ford Hospital’s Cardiac Rehab Program, Dr. Keteyian is also a very accomplished educator and author on the subject of cardiac rehabilitation and is interested in helping with the work we are doing in the post-acute care settings.

Before the end of 2014, your therapy resource, clinical resource and PAC resource teams, in collaboration with the pilot facilities, expect to have a well-defined, fully executable cardiac wellness program guideline, training pieces and clinical pathways developed for sharing throughout the entire organization. There will be a Cardiac Wellness Guidelines Manual, clinical pathways for the program diagnoses, an educational training for the Clinical Program Coordinators, a CEU training and competency-based education program for the therapists, educational flyers for patients on subjects such as smoking cessation, dietary considerations, exercise and self-assessment, as well as a marketing and education campaign for use with the local healthcare community and potential consumers. If you and your team are interested in getting started with a specialty program, please reach out to your local therapy resource for assistance with how to get started. We are here to support you and your interdisciplinary team with living your vision.

By Deb Bielek, Therapy Resource

Are Your Patients “Motivated to Move?”

Fall-Reduction Programming Ideas

We spend a lot of hours trying to stop our patients from moving. We stop them from getting up, picking things up off of the floor, leaving the facility and so on. What if we shifted our focus from the physical aspects of fall prevention and started looking at our patients’ social aspects of life? To put it simply, what if we stop trying to stop them?

motivated-to-moveAs humans, we are motivated by behaviors like meeting an unmet need or wanting to move. Residents who struggle with self-care and mobility might experience feelings of loneliness, helplessness and boredom if they are continually prevented from addressing their intrinsic desire to get moving. In fact, these three emotions account for the primary suffering among our elders! By utilizing social interventions, however, we can not only reduce the frequency of these feelings, but also help to reduce falls, medications, restraints, skin issues, weight loss, etc.

Some of our residents are able to sit for longer periods of time, engage in activities longer, etc., but others are not. We need to identify those residents. In other words, it’s more than a fall risk score to determine who is really at risk to fall. Two residents can have the exact same fall risk score, but one may be at a higher actual risk to fall because of his “motivation to move” behaviors. Our treatment interventions need to include the social aspects for these residents to develop individualized plans.

If you know you have a “mover” on your hands, find out the following from the staff:

  • Can he use the call light?
  • Does he wait for his call light to be answered? Or just transfer himself?
  • Is he independent with transfers?
  • Do you think he is safe if he would transfer himself independently?
  • Is he impatient?
  • Is he bored?
  • Is he in pain?
  • Is he uncomfortable?
  • Does he want to walk more?

Find out the following from the resident/family:

  • What did he like to talk about?
  • Describe his occupation in detail
  • What were his work hours?
  • Was he in charge at work?
  • What did he like to do on Saturdays and Sundays?
  • Did he have a lot of friends or a few close ones?
  • Was he social?
  • What does/did he like to talk about (military, farming, fishing)?
  • Was he busy with his hands?
  • What type of food did he eat at home?

What can we do at the facility to meet this resident’s needs socially?

  • Brainstorm with the recreation & social services departments
  • Review the list of your folks who are motivated to move and review them with the team
  • Ask them to do the investigation for “new” information from the family or the resident on motivation levels and details of social and independent things he preferred
  • Truly individualized interventions are what we are after
  • Think in terms of interests rather than problems when developing the care plan around social interventions

What interventions can be put in place besides the trifecta of alarm, low bed and fall mat? Consider:

  • 24-hour fall journal (1:1 the resident for 24 hours and document the routines)
  • Highlight known fallers on the Care Plan/Care Directives
  • Evaluate the room setup
    • Rearrange furniture
    • Velcro on the remote controls
    • Modifications to closets
    • Dusk-to-dawn lighting
  • Toilet resident consistently
  • Evaluate bathrooms
    • Nonskid strips by toilet
    • Raised/colored seat
    • Arm rests (if they need WC, are they available in the bathroom?)
    • them for sit-to-stand in
    • Lighting : dusk-to-dawn lighting for better lighting at night
    • Bathroom alarms
    • Grab bars/Add texture or color or change where they are located
    • Color difference with toilet seats
  • Evaluate seating and positioning
    • Elevate footrests
    • Recliners
    • W/C drop seats/inserts/adjustments
    • Anti-tippers
    • Auto locks for breaks
  • Evaluate bed positioning
    • The Liberty Bed Wedge (Keen Mobility)/Body pillows/Rolled up blankets/Swim noodles — Be mindful of the purpose of what is being used
    • “Egress Ez” Mattress
    • Bedside mats
  • Engagement — What are their passions/hobbies?
  • Activities designed around personal interests
  • Restorative programming
  • Personal contact

Skilled Rehab Intervention

  • Standardized tests (Be sure to discuss results with IDT)
    • Strength and muscle performance
    • Chair rise test
    • Getting up from lying on the floor test
    • Aerobic capacity
    • Six-minute walk test
    • Seated step test
    • Gait, locomotion and balance
    • Berg
    • Timed Up and Go (TUG)
    • Functional and modified functional reach test
    • Range of motion test
    • Chair, sit and reach test
    • Activities of daily living
    • Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills (Kels)
    • Cognitive
      • Allen Cognitive Levels
      • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Cognitive Performance Test (CPT)
      • St. Louis University Mental Status Exam (SLUMS)
      • Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test
  • Assessment for positioning and support surfaces
    • How long are residents sitting? Do they have the right cushion? Are they comfortable? Is their skin protected? How long can you sit?
    • Older adults with balance impairments have twice as large trunk positioning errors.
    • Hip flexion contractures
    • Strength, coordination, ROM and position sense play a greater role in trunk repositioning than vision or LE somatosensation.
  • More skilled intervention
    • Strength and muscle performance
    • Aerobic capacity
    • Gait, locomotion and balance
    • Range of motion
    • Activities of daily living
    • Cognition
    • Addressing any pain
    • Core stabilizing exercises
    • Modalities

Restorative Programming Ideas

  • Functional ambulation programs
  • Transfer training/Sit-to-stand programs
  • Strengthening/ROM/Flexibility programs
  • Implement facility ambulation programs
    • Take the Dine OUT of Walk to Dine and JUST WALK.
    • Design ambulation programs around individuals’ motivation to move.
    • Anticipate their needs and walk them MORE throughout the day and every shift.
    • Most people will want to rest after exercise regardless of fitness level.
  • Integrate rest or movement periods out of chairs to avoid “slumping” and fatigue

If we do our part to identify wants/needs and activity preferences and help our patients become as independent as possible, we will improve their overall quality of life and see a reduction in falls.

By Tamala Sammons, Therapy Resource